Evaluation methodology Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Evaluation methodology - Term Paper Example Evaluation methodology The researcher will use the CIPP evaluation model to guide this program evaluation. The acronym CIPP stands for context evaluation, input evaluation, process evaluation, and product evaluation. Developed by D. L. Stufflebeam, the CIPP evaluation design employs a logic model to describe the program’s elements. Since the early 1970s, the logic model has been used in the educational system, and represents a plausible and sensible model about how a program will work under certain environmental conditions to solve identified problems. The logic model is the core of a certain program’s planning, evaluation, program management, and communications. It holds together everything a program was originally designed for, from its goals, vision, resources, activities, and intended outcomes in a way that is logical to its purpose (Hall, Daly, & Madigan, 2010). The study to be designed will follow its evaluation approaches to test and verify the reality of the advisory program of a target school and how it works. It will also help the researcher focus on appropriate process and outcome measures. The CIPP model of program evaluation is the process of delineating, obtaining, providing, and applying descriptive and judgmental information about the merit and worth of some object goals, design, implementation, and outcomes to guide improvement decisions, provide accountability reports, inform institutionalization/dissemination decisions, and improve understanding of the involved phenomena.... The CIPP model of program evaluation is the process of delineating, obtaining, providing, and applying descriptive and judgmental information about the merit and worth of some object goals, design, implementation, and outcomes to guide improvement decisions, provide accountability reports, inform institutionalization/dissemination decisions, and improve understanding of the involved phenomena (Kellaghan & Stufflebeam, 2003). It is a simple procedural model that measures program evaluation. It would reflect the efficiency of performance of a certain program. (Wholey, Hart, & Newcomer, 1987; Hong, Teng, & Baum, 2009; Chien, Lee, & Cheng, 2007). The CIPP goes through four stages in the evaluation of programs. The first stage of context evaluation assesses the needs and problems of the program and how set goals are being met. It identifies what needs to be done for improvement. The second stage of input evaluation assesses the organization’s budget and staffing and sees how effect ive resources are being used. The third stage of process evaluation assesses how plans are being implemented and if the activities being performed produce positive outcomes for the stakeholders. The fourth and last stage of product evaluation assesses the outcomes of the program and checks if initial goals have been fulfilled (Stufflebeam & Shinkfield, 2007). Due to its renowned reputation as an effective model of evaluation, this study has chosen the CIPP to evaluate an educational advisory program (Kellaghan & Stufflebeam, 2003). The results of the evaluation using this model will greatly help decision makers to assess the needs of the program in implementing its various activities. Using the CIPP